Template:Isda 3(b) sa: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*An essay on [[Berkeley’s paradox]] — why promising to own up to a breach is a bit ontologically weird. | |||
*{{repprov|No default or potential event of default}} in general. | *{{repprov|No default or potential event of default}} in general. | ||
*[[Representations and Warranties Anatomy]] | *[[Representations and Warranties Anatomy]] | ||
*[[Negative pledge]] | *[[Negative pledge]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:02, 30 December 2023
- An essay on Berkeley’s paradox — why promising to own up to a breach is a bit ontologically weird.
- No default or potential event of default in general.
- Representations and Warranties Anatomy
- Negative pledge