Template:Isda Credit Support Document premium: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{pjchotlink|Don’t confuse a Credit | {{pjchotlink|Don’t confuse a Credit Support Deed with a Credit Support Document}}<li> | ||
{{pjchotlink|An English law CSA is not a Credit Support Document...}}<li> | {{pjchotlink|An English law CSA is not a Credit Support Document...}}<li> | ||
{{pjchotlink|But a New York law CSA is a Credit Support Document}}... — AND SERIOUSLY HOW CAN THEY BE DIFFERENT? Is the ’squad just doing this to ''annoy'' everyone?<li> | {{pjchotlink|But a New York law CSA is a Credit Support Document}}... — AND SERIOUSLY HOW CAN THEY BE DIFFERENT? Is the ’squad just doing this to ''annoy'' everyone?<li> | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{pjchotlink|Guarantees and why Transaction-specific guarantees under ISDA don’t work}}<li>{{pjchotlink|What is the actual difference? Does it matter?}} What happens if you ''do'' designate a CSA as a Credit Support Document when you should not have, or when you ''don’t'' designate as a Credit Support Document a credit support arrangement when you ''should'' have? | {{pjchotlink|Guarantees and why Transaction-specific guarantees under ISDA don’t work}}<li>{{pjchotlink|What is the actual difference? Does it matter?}} What happens if you ''do'' designate a CSA as a Credit Support Document when you should not have, or when you ''don’t'' designate as a Credit Support Document a credit support arrangement when you ''should'' have? | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
''So'' much ninjery. | ''So'' much ninjery. |
Latest revision as of 13:32, 28 August 2024
Don’t confuse a Credit Support Deed with a Credit Support Document
So much ninjery.