Template:M intro casenote Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{cite|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc|2014|EWHC|1156 (Ch)}} is a fine example of the JC’s old legal {{t|maxim}} ''[[anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]]'': Little old ladies (and, in this case, aggrieved Welsh hotel owners) make bad law, {{casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}} ( | {{cite|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc|2014|EWHC|1156 (Ch)}} is a fine example of the JC’s old legal {{t|maxim}} ''[[anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]]'': Little old ladies (and, in this case, aggrieved Welsh hotel owners) make bad law, {{casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}} ({{plainlink|https://tinyurl.com/2zr7z6rz|judgment}}) opines on the apparently harmless {{isda92prov|Notices}} Section ({{isda92prov|12}}) of the {{1992ma}}. It considers the meaning of “[[electronic messaging system]]” and, saucily, finds that it does not include [[email]]. | ||
Let me say that again, in case you missed it: in the eyes of the current [[common law]] '''[[email]] does not count as an “[[electronic messaging system]]”'''. | Let me say that again, in case you missed it: in the eyes of the current [[common law]] '''[[email]] does not count as an “[[electronic messaging system]]”'''. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:23, 30 August 2024
Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc [2014] EWHC 1156 (Ch) is a fine example of the JC’s old legal maxim anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt: Little old ladies (and, in this case, aggrieved Welsh hotel owners) make bad law, Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc (judgment) opines on the apparently harmless Notices Section (12) of the 1992 ISDA. It considers the meaning of “electronic messaging system” and, saucily, finds that it does not include email.
Let me say that again, in case you missed it: in the eyes of the current common law email does not count as an “electronic messaging system”.