Receipt and transmission of orders: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|euregulation|}}A person or firm only carrying out the regulated activity of '''receipt and transmission of orders''' under MiFID II would not have the same best execution obligations as those executing orders. They have related but distinct obligations focused on acting in clients’ best interests and selecting appropriate entities for order transmission." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|euregulation|}}A person or firm only carrying out the regulated activity of '''receipt and transmission of orders''' under MiFID II would not have the same best execution obligations as those executing orders. | {{a|euregulation|}}“Reception and transmission of orders in relation to one or more financial instruments” is the very first investment service and activity listed in part A of Annex I of MiFID 2. | ||
A person or firm only carrying out the regulated activity of '''receipt and transmission of orders''' under MiFID II would not have the same best execution obligations as those executing orders. | |||
Most of the pain and anguish surrounding [[RTO]] relates to transaction reporting. | |||
Latest revision as of 13:41, 9 October 2024
|
The JC’s Reg and Leg resource™
EU Edition
|
“Reception and transmission of orders in relation to one or more financial instruments” is the very first investment service and activity listed in part A of Annex I of MiFID 2.
A person or firm only carrying out the regulated activity of receipt and transmission of orders under MiFID II would not have the same best execution obligations as those executing orders.
Most of the pain and anguish surrounding RTO relates to transaction reporting.