I never said you couldn’t: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A kind of [[profound ontological uncertainty]] which leads to proliferating [[incluso]]s and [[for the avoidance of doubt]]s, is the [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer]]’s reluctance to grasp a simple proposition: ''You don’t have document what you are '''not''' obliged do in a legal contract''. In the absence of a contract you are not obliged to do ''anything''. | A kind of [[profound ontological uncertainty]] which leads to proliferating [[incluso]]s and [[for the avoidance of doubt]]s, is the [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer]]’s reluctance to grasp a simple proposition: ''You don’t have document what you are '''not''' obliged do in a legal contract''. In the absence of a contract you are not obliged to do ''anything''. | ||
Your starting point, therefore, should be that you do not need to say what the parties are not obliged to do. The subtlety comes with trying to peg back a vague, general commitment, by using specific restrictions ([[for the avoidance of doubt]]. Of course, the literary-minded amongst you might prefer to draft clearly and precisely in the first place. | |||
Which brings us to ''Nasty''. | Which brings us to ''Nasty''. |