Template:Noncontractualobligations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If you’ve ever despaired at the pernicketiness of {{tag|governing law}} clauses such as this:— | If you’ve ever despaired at the pernicketiness of {{tag|governing law}} clauses such as this:— | ||
:''This agreement and any [[non-contractual obligation]]s [[arising out of or in connection with it]] shall be governed by and construed [[in accordance with]] {{tag|English law}}.'' <br> | :''This agreement and any [[non-contractual obligation]]s [[arising out of or in connection with it]] shall be [[Governed by and interpreted in accordance with|governed by and construed]] [[in accordance with]] {{tag|English law}}.'' <br> | ||
Then you have the [[Rome II]] {{tag|EU Regulation}}<ref>{{eureg|864|2007|EC}}</ref> to blame. Enacted in 2007, it applies to all {{tag|EU}} Member States<ref>Except {{tag|Denmark}}.</ref> and is designed to harmonise the “[[conflict of laws]]” rules across [[Member States]]<ref>Except {{tag|Denmark}}.</ref> dealing with with [[non-contractual obligations|non-contractual disputes]]. | Then you have the [[Rome II]] {{tag|EU Regulation}}<ref>{{eureg|864|2007|EC}}</ref> to blame. Enacted in 2007, it applies to all {{tag|EU}} Member States<ref>Except {{tag|Denmark}}.</ref> and is designed to harmonise the “[[conflict of laws]]” rules across [[Member States]]<ref>Except {{tag|Denmark}}.</ref> dealing with with [[non-contractual obligations|non-contractual disputes]]. |