Substance and form: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This is a [[correlation]], though, not [[causation]], and it won’t flow the other way. Just because you put the kettle on at 4:30 doesn't mean you were watching the football, however likely it might seem. Probability is an is, not an ought. | This is a [[correlation]], though, not [[causation]], and it won’t flow the other way. Just because you put the kettle on at 4:30 doesn't mean you were watching the football, however likely it might seem. Probability is an is, not an ought. | ||
Hume: you cannot derive an “ought” from an “is”. The [[JC]]: you cannot derive an “is” from an “ought”. | Hume: you cannot derive an “ought” from an “is”. | ||
The [[JC]]: you cannot derive an “is” from an “ought”. | |||
{{Tabletop}} | {{Tabletop}} | ||
Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
|[[Compliance]] | |[[Compliance]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Anything fun or interesting in the world | ||
|[[HR]], [[COO]], [[Management consultant]], [[middle management]] | |[[HR]], [[COO]], [[Management consultant]], [[middle management]] | ||
{{tablebottom}} | {{tablebottom}} |