Deliveries of Income - GMSLA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{gmslaanat|4.4}} | {{gmslaanat|4.4}}[[Freshfields]]’ {{gmsla}} guidance notes helpfully provide that “Paragraph 4.4 provides for the mechanism for the delivery of income payments.” | ||
Well, gee, fellas — thanks for writing in. What these customary and appropriate endorsements or assignments might be, and why the [[Manufactured payments in respect of Loaned Securities - GMSLA Provision|manufacturer]] has to grant them, even where the actual securities issuer didn’t, we can only speculate. Perhaps — speculation here — it is because the {{gmslaprov|Borrower}} is most likely to have immediately sold the {{gmslaprov|Loaned Securities}} into the market — the major purpose of a {{Gmsla}} being short serlling, after all — and so won’t ''get'' any {{gmslaprov|Income}} under the shares, much less any “customary endorsements” relating to it, whatever in this day and age that might mean. | |||
The same goes — with less certainty, perhaps<ref>The {{gmslaprov|Lender}} isn’t acquiring the {{gmslaprov|Collateral}} with the express purpose of selling it, although it does acquire it by [[title transfer]] and absolutely is entitled to sell it.</ref> — for the {{gmslaprov|Lender}} of {{gmslaprov|Collateral}} that is has received by [[title transfer]]. So it would be interesting to contrast this with the equivalent provision in the {{pgmsla}}, wouldn’t it. | |||
Let’s therefore go and do that. Back in a minute. |