Template:Isda 5(a)(v) comp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{{{{1}}}|DUST}} has been expanded in five significant ways by the {{2002ma}}: | ||
*Defaults require the [[acceleration]] of just ''the'' {{ | *Defaults require the [[acceleration]] of just ''the'' {{{{{1}}}|Specified Transaction}} in question (for ''general'' defaults) but off ''all'' outstanding transactions under the relevant [[master agreement]] (for ''[[delivery]]'' defaults). This change was made with [[repo]]s and [[stock loan]]s in mind where delivery failures under are common and do not of themselves indicate weakness in the {{{{{1}}}|Defaulting Party}}’s creditworthiness. | ||
*{{isdaprov|DUST}} under the {{2002ma}} can be triggered by default under a [[credit support arrangement]] relating to a {{isdaprov|Specified Transaction}}. These weren’t included for the {{1992isda}} {{isda92prov|DUST}}. | *{{isdaprov|DUST}} under the {{2002ma}} can be triggered by default under a [[credit support arrangement]] relating to a {{isdaprov|Specified Transaction}}. These weren’t included for the {{1992isda}} {{isda92prov|DUST}}. | ||
*The [[cure period]] for a failure to make a final or early termination payment ona {{ | *The [[cure period]] for a failure to make a final or early termination payment ona {{{{{1}}}|Specified Transaction}} has been reduced from three days to one. | ||
*[[Repudiation]] was modified in two significant ways: | *[[Repudiation]] was modified in two significant ways: | ||
:*The phrase “or challenges the validity of” was added after “disaffirms, disclaims, repudiates or rejects” to reduce ambiguity as to whether a party’s action constitutes a repudiation; and | :*The phrase “or challenges the validity of” was added after “disaffirms, disclaims, repudiates or rejects” to reduce ambiguity as to whether a party’s action constitutes a repudiation; and | ||
:*A {{ | :*A {{{{{1}}}|Non-Defaulting Party}} must have evidence of the repudiation that is executed and [[delivered]] by the repudiating entity; | ||
*The “{{ | *The “{{{{{1}}}|Specified Transaction}}” concept has been broadened to include additional transaction types such as repos, and to include a catchall clause designed to include any future derivative products that have not been thought of yet. |