Not everybody is a game-changer, but everybody can make a game-changing impact: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ===Not everyone ''is'' a [[game-changer]], but everyone ''can be'' a [[game-changer]]===
 What use is someone who ''could'' be, but eventually ''isn’t'', a [[game-changer]]? And if we are being [[deterministic]] about it — something the [[JC]] is not usually minded to do, except when proving a point like this one, but still — if it turns out you ''aren’t'' a [[game-changer]] now, then it was as true then as it is now, that you were ''never'' going to be one: you just didn’t know it. In which case, was it ever really true that you ''could'' be a [[game-changer]]? We say no.
-If not that, then it must seek to draw a distinction between a “[[game-changer]]” and a “person who makes a game-changing impact”. But the latter seem, to your correspondent, to be the very definition of the former. Building in our previous learning, we can extract the following:
+===[[Game-changer]]s and game-changing contributions===
+If not that, then it must seek to draw a distinction between a “[[game-changer]]” and a “person who makes a game-changing contribution”. But the latter seem, to your correspondent, to be the very definition of the former. Building in our previous learning, we can extract the following:
 :P1 Not everybody is a [[game-changer]].

Navigation menu