Template:Olympus: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
===“Olympus”?===
===“[[Olympus]]”?===
A correspondent writes:
A correspondent writes:
{{quote|Sorry but you ALL HAVE IT WRONG!!! THE LYRIC IS “RISES LIKE A LEOPRESS”... THIS HAS BEEN BUGGING THE F OUT OF ME FOR YEARS. I think Weezer screwed up the whole world in this lyric... read his lips in the video}}
{{quote|Sorry but you ALL HAVE IT WRONG!!! THE LYRIC IS “RISES LIKE A LEOPRESS”... THIS HAS BEEN BUGGING THE F OUT OF ME FOR YEARS. I think Weezer screwed up the whole world in this lyric... read his lips in the video}}
Line 13: Line 13:
Secondly, the “leop’r’ess” contraction strikes me as implausible, particularly as elsewhere [[David Paich|Mr. Paich]] gives the strong impression that he is not in the habit of making literary contractions for the sake of space. After all, he has already jammed twenty one syllables into a line apparently requiring only fourteen. Why start now?
Secondly, the “leop’r’ess” contraction strikes me as implausible, particularly as elsewhere [[David Paich|Mr. Paich]] gives the strong impression that he is not in the habit of making literary contractions for the sake of space. After all, he has already jammed twenty one syllables into a line apparently requiring only fourteen. Why start now?


Thirdly, if you ''did'' want to squeeze “word for a big, fast cat” into two syllables, instead of butchering “leopardess”, wouldn’t you just use “leopard”? Are lady cats more given to “rising” than gentlemen cats? Quite the reverse, in the JC’s limited experience.
Thirdly, if you ''did'' want to squeeze “word for a big, fast, African cat” into two syllables, instead of butchering “[[leopardess]]”, wouldn’t you just use “''leopard''”? Are lady cats more given to “rising” than gentlemen cats? The [[JC]] has limited experience of this sort of thing, but we doubt it.