Template:Csa title transfer vs pledge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
**Recipient holds securities as transferor's custodian subject to a {{tag|security interest}} securing their obligation under the swap. | **Recipient holds securities as transferor's custodian subject to a {{tag|security interest}} securing their obligation under the swap. | ||
**The custody arrangement only exists while recipient holds the security, not before. | **The custody arrangement only exists while recipient holds the security, not before. | ||
**Under US iterations of this form (e.g. the {{1994csa}} the pledgee may nonetheless be entitled to sell the pledged asset absolutely, under a process known as [[rehypothecation]]. Don’t laugh. [[Amwell J|We]] think this converts the pledge into a [[title transfer collateral arrangement]] - at least at the point of [[rehypothecation]], if not before. | **Under US iterations of this form (e.g. the {{1994csa}}) the pledgee may nonetheless be entitled to sell the pledged asset absolutely, under a process known as [[rehypothecation]]. Don’t laugh. [[Amwell J|We]] think this converts the pledge into a [[title transfer collateral arrangement]] - at least at the point of [[rehypothecation]], if not before. |
Revision as of 14:15, 27 October 2016
===Title transfer vs. Pledge=== This feels as good a time as any to raise the great subject of title transfer and pledge. In a Nutshell™:
- Title Transfer: The 1995 CSA – outside the US, by far the most common type of 1995 CSA – is a title transfer document:
- when securities delivered to a party they become the recipient's property absolutely
- recipient does not hold them in custody for the transferor;
- recipient has only an obligation to redeliver an equivalent security.
- Therefore no CASS question arises at any point.
- Pledge: The 1995 ISDA CSD (English law) and 1994 NY CSA are “pledge” documents:
- The transferor delivers the securities to the receipient to hold for the transferor – the transferor retains title.
- Recipient holds securities as transferor's custodian subject to a security interest securing their obligation under the swap.
- The custody arrangement only exists while recipient holds the security, not before.
- Under US iterations of this form (e.g. the 1994 NY CSA) the pledgee may nonetheless be entitled to sell the pledged asset absolutely, under a process known as rehypothecation. Don’t laugh. We think this converts the pledge into a title transfer collateral arrangement - at least at the point of rehypothecation, if not before.