Template:Csa title transfer vs pledge: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
**Recipient holds securities as transferor's custodian subject to a {{tag|security interest}} securing their obligation under the swap.
**Recipient holds securities as transferor's custodian subject to a {{tag|security interest}} securing their obligation under the swap.
**The custody arrangement only exists while recipient holds the security, not before.
**The custody arrangement only exists while recipient holds the security, not before.
**Under US iterations of this form (e.g. the {{1994csa}} the pledgee may nonetheless be entitled to sell the pledged asset absolutely, under a process known as [[rehypothecation]]. Don’t laugh. [[Amwell J|We]] think this converts the pledge into a [[title transfer collateral arrangement]] - at least at the point of [[rehypothecation]], if not before.
**Under US iterations of this form (e.g. the {{1994csa}}) the pledgee may nonetheless be entitled to sell the pledged asset absolutely, under a process known as [[rehypothecation]]. Don’t laugh. [[Amwell J|We]] think this converts the pledge into a [[title transfer collateral arrangement]] - at least at the point of [[rehypothecation]], if not before.

Revision as of 14:15, 27 October 2016

Title transfer vs. Pledge

This feels as good a time as any to raise the great subject of title transfer and pledge. In a Nutshell:

  • Title Transfer: The 1995 CSA – outside the US, by far the most common type of 1995 CSA – is a title transfer document:
    • when securities delivered to a party they become the recipient's property absolutely
    • recipient does not hold them in custody for the transferor;
    • recipient has only an obligation to redeliver an equivalent security.
    • Therefore no CASS question arises at any point.
  • Pledge: The 1995 ISDA CSD (English law) and 1994 NY CSA are “pledge” documents:
    • The transferor delivers the securities to the receipient to hold for the transferor – the transferor retains title.
    • Recipient holds securities as transferor's custodian subject to a security interest securing their obligation under the swap.
    • The custody arrangement only exists while recipient holds the security, not before.
    • Under US iterations of this form (e.g. the 1994 NY CSA) the pledgee may nonetheless be entitled to sell the pledged asset absolutely, under a process known as rehypothecation. Don’t laugh. We think this converts the pledge into a title transfer collateral arrangement - at least at the point of rehypothecation, if not before.