Template:Set-off and netting: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===The difference between [[close-out netting]] and [[set-off]]=== | ===The difference between [[close-out netting]] and [[set-off]]=== | ||
*'''[[Close-out netting]]''', in the learned words of [[Allen & Overy]], is a contractual process comprising [[early termination]], [[valuation]] and determination of a net balance. This last step may involve a [[contractual set-off]] but, saucily, the considered view of ISDA’s counsel for England and Wales is that the net effect of the agreement is to arrive a a net balance ''without'' the good offices of contractual set-off<ref>Sigh - except where there are unpaid amounts payable under Section 2(a)(i). You knew there’d be some kind of qualification though, didn’t you.</ref> | *'''[[Close-out netting]]''', in the learned words of [[Allen & Overy]], is a contractual process comprising [[early termination]], [[valuation]] and determination of a net balance. This last step may involve a [[contractual set-off]] but, saucily, the considered view of ISDA’s counsel for England and Wales is that the net effect of the agreement is to arrive a a net balance ''without'' the good offices of contractual set-off<ref>Sigh - except where there are unpaid amounts payable under Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(i)}}. You knew there’d be some kind of qualification though, didn’t you.</ref> | ||
*'''[[Set-off]]''' is a legal principle permitting (or requiring) a debtor to discharge its debt by setting off a cross-claim owed to the debtor against the debt. There are various legal bases for set-off, including, under English law, equitable set-off, set-off in judicial proceedings under the Civil Procedure Rules, statutory set-off under the Insolvency Rules 1986 upon a winding upor administration and [[contractual set-off]]. <br /> | *'''[[Set-off]]''' is a legal principle permitting (or requiring) a debtor to discharge its debt by setting off a cross-claim owed to the debtor against the debt. There are various legal bases for set-off, including, under English law, [[equitable set-off]], set-off in judicial proceedings under the Civil Procedure Rules, [[statutory set-off]] under the Insolvency Rules 1986 upon a winding upor administration and [[contractual set-off]]. <br /> | ||
Revision as of 16:09, 16 May 2017
The difference between close-out netting and set-off
- Close-out netting, in the learned words of Allen & Overy, is a contractual process comprising early termination, valuation and determination of a net balance. This last step may involve a contractual set-off but, saucily, the considered view of ISDA’s counsel for England and Wales is that the net effect of the agreement is to arrive a a net balance without the good offices of contractual set-off[1]
- Set-off is a legal principle permitting (or requiring) a debtor to discharge its debt by setting off a cross-claim owed to the debtor against the debt. There are various legal bases for set-off, including, under English law, equitable set-off, set-off in judicial proceedings under the Civil Procedure Rules, statutory set-off under the Insolvency Rules 1986 upon a winding upor administration and contractual set-off.