Fruits of the contract: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "Not what you think it is. Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a ''double entendre'' bypass, were thinking only of the benefit one expects to accrue..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not what you think it is. | Not what you think it is. | ||
Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a ''[[double entendre]]'' bypass, were thinking only of the benefit one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his legally binding promises to you. | Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a ''[[double entendre]]'' bypass, were thinking only of the [[Consideration|benefit]] one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his [[Contract|legally binding promises]] to you. | ||
{{ | {{draft}} | ||
{{egg}} | |||
Revision as of 14:44, 24 April 2017
Not what you think it is.
Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a double entendre bypass, were thinking only of the benefit one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his legally binding promises to you.