Fruits of the contract: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a ''[[double entendre]]'' bypass, were thinking only of the [[Consideration|benefit]] one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his [[Contract|legally binding promises]] to you. | Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a ''[[double entendre]]'' bypass, were thinking only of the [[Consideration|benefit]] one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his [[Contract|legally binding promises]] to you. | ||
{{seealso}} | |||
*[[Frutti di bosco]] | |||
{{draft}} | {{draft}} | ||
{{egg}} | {{egg}} | ||
Revision as of 15:51, 3 May 2017
Not what you think it is.
Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a double entendre bypass, were thinking only of the benefit one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his legally binding promises to you.