Fruits of the contract: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Not what you think it is.
{{a|glossary|}}Not what you think it is.


Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a ''[[double entendre]]'' bypass, were thinking only of the [[Consideration|benefit]] one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his [[Contract|legally binding promises]] to you.
Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a ''[[double entendre]]'' bypass, were thinking only of the [[Consideration|benefit]] one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his [[Contract|legally binding promises]] to you.

Revision as of 15:53, 13 June 2019

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Not what you think it is.

Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a double entendre bypass, were thinking only of the benefit one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his legally binding promises to you.

See also