Template:Failure to pay procedure: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*'''Failure''': A [[failure to pay]], on day T; | *'''Failure''': A [[failure to pay]], on day T; | ||
*'''Notice of failure''': The innocent party to give notice of the failure (which, [[Q.E.D.]], can be validly given ''only after'' [[close of business]] on the due date for payment or delivery (until then, the guilty party isn't technically “guilty”) and, by dint of Section {{isdaprov|12(a)}} ({{isdaprov|Notices}}), the notice will only be deemed effective on the following business day, T+1 | *'''Notice of failure''': The innocent party to give notice of the failure (which, [[Q.E.D.]], can be validly given ''only after'' [[close of business]] on the due date for payment or delivery (until then, the guilty party isn't technically “guilty”) and, by dint of Section {{isdaprov|12(a)}} ({{isdaprov|Notices}}), the notice will only be deemed effective on the following business day, T+1 | ||
*'''[[Grace Period]]''': After the notice of failure is delivered, the grace period must have expired (this depends on the ISDA edition you’re using: '''one''' under the {{2002isda}}; and '''three''' under the {{1992isda}}, and check also Part 5 of the ISDA {{isdaprov|Schedule}} to see if it has been amended specifically for the counterparty. | *'''[[Grace Period]]''': After the notice of failure is delivered, the grace period must have expired (this depends on the ISDA edition you’re using: '''one''' under the {{2002isda}}; and '''three''' under the {{1992isda}}, and check also Part 5 of the ISDA {{isdaprov|Schedule}} to see if it has been amended specifically for the counterparty. <br> | ||
Therefore close of business T+2 (standard {{2002ma}}), T+4 (standard {{1992ma}}) | |||
*'''Section {{isdaprov|6(e)}} notice''': The {{isdaprov|notice of termination}} may only be served after close of business at the expiry of the grace period, so therefore the first day on which a termination notice following a failure to pay {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} can be effective under an ISDA is T+3 ({{2002isda}}) or T+5 {{1992isda}}. | *'''Section {{isdaprov|6(e)}} notice''': The {{isdaprov|notice of termination}} may only be served after close of business at the expiry of the grace period, so therefore the first day on which a termination notice following a failure to pay {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} can be effective under an ISDA is T+3 ({{2002isda}}) or T+5 {{1992isda}}. | ||
Revision as of 14:30, 21 March 2018
Failure to pay procedure
Terminating the ISDA Master Agreement on this ground requires:
- Failure: A failure to pay, on day T;
- Notice of failure: The innocent party to give notice of the failure (which, Q.E.D., can be validly given only after close of business on the due date for payment or delivery (until then, the guilty party isn't technically “guilty”) and, by dint of Section 12(a) (Notices), the notice will only be deemed effective on the following business day, T+1
- Grace Period: After the notice of failure is delivered, the grace period must have expired (this depends on the ISDA edition you’re using: one under the 2002 ISDA; and three under the 1992 ISDA, and check also Part 5 of the ISDA Schedule to see if it has been amended specifically for the counterparty.
Therefore close of business T+2 (standard 2002 ISDA), T+4 (standard 1992 ISDA)
- Section 6(e) notice: The notice of termination may only be served after close of business at the expiry of the grace period, so therefore the first day on which a termination notice following a failure to pay Event of Default can be effective under an ISDA is T+3 (2002 ISDA) or T+5 1992 ISDA.