Liquidation of hedges - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{eqderivanat|12.8(e)|}} | ||
{{nuts|Equity Derivatives|12.8(e) | {{nuts|Equity Derivatives|12.8(e)}} | ||
This makes it clear that on a {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}}, for example, the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}} can pass on at least the [[market risk]] of replacing any disrupted hedge. (And probably the [[credit risk]] too, though where the hedge is a cash trade settling [[DVP]] there would be no credit exposure). | This makes it clear that on a {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}}, for example, the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}} can pass on at least the [[market risk]] of replacing any disrupted hedge. (And probably the [[credit risk]] too, though where the hedge is a cash trade settling [[DVP]] there would be no credit exposure). | ||
{{2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions Section 12.8 TOC}} | {{2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions Section 12.8 TOC}} | ||
Revision as of 11:46, 18 January 2020
12.8(e) in a Nutshell™ (Equity Derivatives edition)
- 12.8(e): Without duplication and when it is commercially reasonable to do so, when calculating a Cancellation Amount the Determining Party may consider any loss or cost (or gain) incurred in terminating, liquidating or re-establishing any hedge.
This makes it clear that on a Hedging Disruption, for example, the Determining Party can pass on at least the market risk of replacing any disrupted hedge. (And probably the credit risk too, though where the hedge is a cash trade settling DVP there would be no credit exposure).
Section 12.8. Cancellation Amount
- 12.8(a) “Cancellation Amount”
- 12.8(b) “Means of determination”
- 12.8(c) “Determination”
- 12.8(d) “Quotations”
- 12.8(e) “Liquidation of hedges”
- 12.8(f) “Determining Party”
- 12.8(g) “Commercially reasonable procedures”