Split infinitive: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A bogus “rule” of English {{tag|grammar}}, the prohibition on split | {{g}}{{pe}}A bogus “rule” of English {{tag|grammar}}, the prohibition on [[split infinitive]]s frowns self-righteously on interposing an {{tag|adverb}} in middle of a {{tag|verb}}al infinitive. | ||
One should, according to this disposition, prefer “to go quickly” over “to quickly go”. | One should, according to this disposition, prefer “to go quickly” over “to quickly go”. | ||
But there is no such rule in English. Why would there be? What is special about the [[infinitive]] form? No pedant, however contumelious, has ever explained why it would be any less offensive to say | But there is no such rule in English. Why would there be? What is special about the [[infinitive]] form? No pedant, however contumelious, has ever explained why it would be any less offensive to say “[[I]] quickly go” (not an infinitive, and apparently perfectly acceptable) than “''to'' quickly go”. | ||
Nor can this aversion have derived, as some have claimed, from {{tag|Latin}}. Latin infinitives (''ire'', or ''amare'') have no {{tag|preposition}} to brazenly split. | Nor can this aversion have derived, as some have claimed, from {{tag|Latin}}. Latin infinitives (''ire'', or ''amare'') have no {{tag|preposition}} to brazenly split. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
It fell to an American TV producer, Gene Rodenberry, to forever put the matter beyond doubt. | It fell to an American TV producer, Gene Rodenberry, to forever put the matter beyond doubt. | ||
:''To boldly go where no man has gone before.'' | |||
Revision as of 13:07, 18 July 2019
|
|
Towards more picturesque speech™
|
A bogus “rule” of English grammar, the prohibition on split infinitives frowns self-righteously on interposing an adverb in middle of a verbal infinitive.
One should, according to this disposition, prefer “to go quickly” over “to quickly go”.
But there is no such rule in English. Why would there be? What is special about the infinitive form? No pedant, however contumelious, has ever explained why it would be any less offensive to say “I quickly go” (not an infinitive, and apparently perfectly acceptable) than “to quickly go”. Nor can this aversion have derived, as some have claimed, from Latin. Latin infinitives (ire, or amare) have no preposition to brazenly split.
It is another question altogether whether you should be using an adverb in the first place. Why say “quickly go” or “go quickly”, when you can say “rush”?
It fell to an American TV producer, Gene Rodenberry, to forever put the matter beyond doubt.
- To boldly go where no man has gone before.