MiFID 2: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{anat|mifid2}}Like [[MiFID]], only better.
{{anat|mifid2}}
 
Like [[MiFID]], only better.
Pressing issue of the day: is it “[[MiFID 2]]” or “[[MiFID II]]”?
===Style===
 
*Make sure you get the CHiPs-style capitalisation right.
Important to get the form right.  
*Is it “[[MiFID 2]]” or “[[MiFID II]]”? It is important to get the form right. One view is it must be roman numerals because, well, Star Wars, and not Police Academy. Another is that for exactly that reason, it must be [[MiFID 2]].  
 
===Substance===
One view is it must be roman numerals because - well, Star Wars, and not Police Academy.
It's a directive about {{MiFIDprov|financial instrument}}s, so what exactly counts as a [[financial instrument]] is of some interest, right?
 
I SAY THAT IS ALL THE MORE REASON IT SHOULD BE [[MiFID 2]].
 
Bite me.
 


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[MiFID]]
*[[MiFID]]
*[[Circle of delegation]]
*[[Circle of delegation]]

Revision as of 10:17, 5 July 2018

MiFID 2 Anatomy™

{{{2}}}

MiFID 2: Less fondly known as EU Directive 2014/65/EU (EUR Lex) | MiFID 1Articles: 16(7) (Recording of Communications)
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


Like MiFID, only better.

Style

  • Make sure you get the CHiPs-style capitalisation right.
  • Is it “MiFID 2” or “MiFID II”? It is important to get the form right. One view is it must be roman numerals because, well, Star Wars, and not Police Academy. Another is that for exactly that reason, it must be MiFID 2.

Substance

It's a directive about [[financial instrument - {{{2}}} Directive Provision|financial instrument]]s, so what exactly counts as a financial instrument is of some interest, right?

See also