It's stuck with our legal: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:
Most likely it isn’t stuck ''with'' {{tag|legal}}. It’s stuck with someone else (often [[credit]]) but legal just happens to be running the docs. When your industry is the negotiation of master trading documents, there typically ''aren’t'' any ''specifically'' legal issues: They were all ironed when the template was hammered out in 1987. It will be trading calls, or credit calls, or risk calls.
Most likely it isn’t stuck ''with'' {{tag|legal}}. It’s stuck with someone else (often [[credit]]) but legal just happens to be running the docs. When your industry is the negotiation of master trading documents, there typically ''aren’t'' any ''specifically'' legal issues: They were all ironed when the template was hammered out in 1987. It will be trading calls, or credit calls, or risk calls.


{{seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[Legal]]
*[[Legal]]
*[[Legal eagles]]
*[[Legal eagles]]

Latest revision as of 11:36, 18 January 2020

The bane of the lawyer’s life - being blamed by salespeople who JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND. Most likely it isn’t stuck with legal. It’s stuck with someone else (often credit) but legal just happens to be running the docs. When your industry is the negotiation of master trading documents, there typically aren’t any specifically legal issues: They were all ironed when the template was hammered out in 1987. It will be trading calls, or credit calls, or risk calls.

See also