Bridged Agreement - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{fullanat|isdabridge|1(b)|2001}}"
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanat|isdabridge|1(b)|2001}}
{{fullanat|isdabridge|1(b)|2001}}
why would you have a single {{isdaprov|Bridged Agreement}} you may ask. A bridge to nowhere? Perhaps the {{isdama}} is deemed to be an agreement — I honestly can’t summon the fortitude to have a look. It’s bound do be something devastatingly logical like that.

Revision as of 18:01, 18 April 2018

2001 ISDA Cross-Agreement Bridge

2001 ISDA Cross-Agreement Bridge

1(b) For purposes of this provision, the following agreement[s] between the parties, as amended from time to time, or any restatement or replacement thereof, will constitute [a] Bridged Agreement[s]:
(i) [specify agreement(s), together with its/their effective date(s)]; and
(ii) any agreement that the parties agree will be subject to the 2001 ISDA Cross-Agreement Bridge.

(view template)

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

why would you have a single Bridged Agreement you may ask. A bridge to nowhere? Perhaps the ISDA Master Agreement is deemed to be an agreement — I honestly can’t summon the fortitude to have a look. It’s bound do be something devastatingly logical like that.