No oral amendment: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m Amwelladmin moved page NOM to No oral modification
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
“'''[[No oral modification]]'''”. A self-contradictory stricture on an [[amendment agreement]], until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers.
“'''[[No oral modification]]'''” is a self-contradictory stricture on an [[amendment agreement]], until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers.


No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an entirely vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in {{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}.
No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an entirely vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in {{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}.

Revision as of 13:03, 18 May 2018

No oral modification” is a self-contradictory stricture on an amendment agreement, until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers.

No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an entirely vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited.

See also