Operationalisation: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{A|negotiation|}}The [[management consultancy]] dogma which sees and lovingly embraces a dystopian future in which the machines take over, and is hell bent on getting them to take over now.
{{A|Technology|}}The [[management consultancy]] dogma which sees and lovingly embraces a dystopian future in which the machines take over, and is hell bent on getting them to take over now.


The good news, long term, is that the idea is profoundly flawed and that machines are not going to take over. The bad news, short term, is that this will not become apparent for a long time yet, and many good people will be disenfranchised and driven up the wall in the mean time.
The good news, long term, is that the idea is profoundly flawed and that machines are not going to take over. The bad news, short term, is that this will not become apparent for a long time yet, and many good people will be disenfranchised and driven up the wall in the mean time.

Revision as of 16:20, 28 December 2018

JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

The management consultancy dogma which sees and lovingly embraces a dystopian future in which the machines take over, and is hell bent on getting them to take over now.

The good news, long term, is that the idea is profoundly flawed and that machines are not going to take over. The bad news, short term, is that this will not become apparent for a long time yet, and many good people will be disenfranchised and driven up the wall in the mean time.

See also