Template:Nutshell MiFID 2 39: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Article {{mifid2prov|39}} '''{{mifid2prov|Establishment of a branch}}''' 1. A {{mifid2prov|Member State}} may require that a {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}} intending to..."
 
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
2.  In such a case, the {{mifid2prov|branch}} must have the necessary regulatory authorisation in that {{mifid2prov|Member State}} on the following conditions:
2.  In such a case, the {{mifid2prov|branch}} must have the necessary regulatory authorisation in that {{mifid2prov|Member State}} on the following conditions:


:(a) The {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}} is appropriately regulated for the services in question in its own jurisdiction, and its local regulator has [[AML]] rules consistent with [[FATF]] recommendations<ref>The original sentence is a horror-show — this is a best guess at summarising it</ref>;
:(a) '''Sufficient local recognition esp. re AML''': The {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}} is appropriately regulated for the services in question in its own jurisdiction, and its local regulator has [[AML]] rules consistent with [[FATF]] recommendations<ref>The original sentence is a horror-show — this is a best guess at summarising it</ref>;


:(b) the {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}}’s home regulator co-operates and shares information with competent authorities in the relevant {{mifid2prov|Member State}};
:(b) '''Information sharing between regulators''': The {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}}’s home regulator co-operates and shares information with competent authorities in the relevant {{mifid2prov|Member State}};


:(c) sufficient initial [[capital]] is at free disposal of the {{mifid2prov|branch}};
:(c) '''Sufficient capitalisation''': Sufficient initial [[capital]] is at free disposal of the {{mifid2prov|branch}};


:(d) there is a responsible manager of the {{mifid2prov|branch}} who complies with the requirement of Article {{mifid2prov|9}}(1);
:(d) '''Responsible individuals''': there is at least one responsible manager of the {{mifid2prov|branch}} and all who are responsible complies with the requirement of Article {{mifid2prov|9}}(1);


(e) :the {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}}’s home jurisdiction shares necessary tax information with the relevant {{mifid2prov|Member State}} in compliance with Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital ;
:(e) '''Tax sharing''': The {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}}’s home jurisdiction shares necessary tax information with the relevant {{mifid2prov|Member State}} in compliance with Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital ;


:(f) the {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}} belongs to an investor-compensation scheme recognised under the Investor Compensation Schemes Directive ({{eudirective|97|9|EC}}).
:(f) '''Investor compensation schemes''': The {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}} belongs to an investor-compensation scheme recognised under the Investor Compensation Schemes Directive ({{eudirective|97|9|EC}}).


3.  The {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}} applies to the competent authority in the relevant {{mifid2prov|Member State}}.
3.  The {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}} applies to the competent authority in the relevant {{mifid2prov|Member State}}.

Revision as of 13:43, 14 December 2018

Article 39 Establishment of a branch

1. A Member State may require that a third-country firm intending to provide investment services to clients[1] in its territory establish a branch in that Member State.

2. In such a case, the branch must have the necessary regulatory authorisation in that Member State on the following conditions:

(a) Sufficient local recognition esp. re AML: The third-country firm is appropriately regulated for the services in question in its own jurisdiction, and its local regulator has AML rules consistent with FATF recommendations[2];
(b) Information sharing between regulators: The third-country firm’s home regulator co-operates and shares information with competent authorities in the relevant Member State;
(c) Sufficient capitalisation: Sufficient initial capital is at free disposal of the branch;
(d) Responsible individuals: there is at least one responsible manager of the branch and all who are responsible complies with the requirement of Article 9(1);
(e) Tax sharing: The third-country firm’s home jurisdiction shares necessary tax information with the relevant Member State in compliance with Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital ;
(f) Investor compensation schemes: The third-country firm belongs to an investor-compensation scheme recognised under the Investor Compensation Schemes Directive (97/9/EC (EUR Lex)).

3. The third-country firm applies to the competent authority in the relevant Member State.

  1. Strictly, retail clients or professional clients. Therefore ECPs are out of scope?
  2. The original sentence is a horror-show — this is a best guess at summarising it