Template:Repack programme - FWMD: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fwmdtt | {{fwmdtt | ||
|imagetype=png | |||
|title=Secured [[limited recourse]] [[asset-backed]] [[medium term note programme]] | |title=Secured [[limited recourse]] [[asset-backed]] [[medium term note programme]] | ||
|nickname=Repack programme | |nickname=Repack programme | ||
Revision as of 18:12, 29 October 2019
| [[File:{{{image}}}|frameless|2000px|center]] |
| Docs | Propectus, trust deed, agency agreements, pricing supplements, swap agreements, global notes, side letters galore. 8 | {{{docscore}}} |
| Amendability | Bugger all, because of the trust structure. What? You think the Trustee’s going to take a view? 1. | {{{amendscore}}} |
| Collateral | None. Fully funded. 0. | {{{collateralscore}}} |
| Transferability | In theory unlimited: cleared, dematerialised bearer notes. In practice? Forget about it. No-one wants your home-made espievie paper | {{{transferscore}}} |
| Leverage | Some, but unilateral structure makes it hard in practice. 2 | {{{leveragescore}}} |
| Fright-o-meter | CAYMAN ISLANDS DUDE! In reality depends what you put in it, but mostly tame. 6 | {{{frightscore}}} |