Template:Confi injunctions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "====Possibility of injunctions==== Some people like to acknowledge that the potential consequences of breach of confidence are so severe that ordinary contractual damage..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Possibility of injunctions==== | ====Possibility of injunctions and equitable {{confiprov|remedies}}==== | ||
Some people like to acknowledge that the potential consequences of [[breach of confidence]] are so severe that ordinary [[contractual damages]] might not be adequate and [[equitable]] relief might be the only means of protecting your position. [[Injunction|Injunctions]], [[dawn raid]]s, [[Anton Piller]] orders and so on. Whatever floats your boat<ref>See {{Casenote|Anton Piller KG|Manufacturing Processes Limited}}.</ref>. This is by way of [[excuse pre-loading]] to gain an acknowledgment so when the poor victim who goes to the [[courts of chancery]] seeking injunctive relief can point to M’lud (or at the defendant) and say, “You see, your honour? That rascal knew perfectly well I might need an injunction here.” | Some people like to acknowledge that the potential consequences of [[breach of confidence]] are so severe that ordinary [[contractual damages]] might not be adequate and [[equitable]] relief might be the only means of protecting your position. [[Injunction|Injunctions]], [[dawn raid]]s, [[Anton Piller]] orders and so on. Whatever floats your boat<ref>See {{Casenote|Anton Piller KG|Manufacturing Processes Limited}}.</ref>. This is by way of [[excuse pre-loading]] to gain an acknowledgment so when the poor victim who goes to the [[courts of chancery]] seeking injunctive relief can point to M’lud (or at the defendant) and say, “You see, your honour? That rascal knew perfectly well I might need an injunction here.” | ||
Revision as of 15:22, 13 May 2019
Possibility of injunctions and equitable remedies
Some people like to acknowledge that the potential consequences of breach of confidence are so severe that ordinary contractual damages might not be adequate and equitable relief might be the only means of protecting your position. Injunctions, dawn raids, Anton Piller orders and so on. Whatever floats your boat[1]. This is by way of excuse pre-loading to gain an acknowledgment so when the poor victim who goes to the courts of chancery seeking injunctive relief can point to M’lud (or at the defendant) and say, “You see, your honour? That rascal knew perfectly well I might need an injunction here.”