You have read and understood these terms: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{pe}}It’s great isn’t it? Can you just imagine the turtle you’d be looking under to prove this one? :''Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C''.: M’lud, we have conclusive e..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{pe}}It’s great isn’t it? Can you just imagine the turtle you’d be looking under to prove this one? | {{pe}}It’s great isn’t it? Can you just imagine the turtle you’d be looking under to prove this one? | ||
:''Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C''.: M’lud, we have conclusive evidence that the defendant knew of this disclaimer, rendered I might add in [[ | :''Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C''.: M’lud, we have conclusive evidence that the defendant knew of this disclaimer, rendered I might add in [[CAPS LOCK|FULL CAPITALS]] on page 346 of the presentation. | ||
:''Defendant'': No I didn't. | :''Defendant'': No I didn't. | ||
:''Lord Justice Cockle-Carrot M.R.'': Didn't you? | :''Lord Justice Cockle-Carrot M.R.'': Didn't you? | ||
Revision as of 18:17, 15 October 2019
|
Towards more picturesque speech™
|
It’s great isn’t it? Can you just imagine the turtle you’d be looking under to prove this one?
- Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C.: M’lud, we have conclusive evidence that the defendant knew of this disclaimer, rendered I might add in FULL CAPITALS on page 346 of the presentation.
- Defendant: No I didn't.
- Lord Justice Cockle-Carrot M.R.: Didn't you?
- Defendant. No, sir. I didn't read it!
- Sir Jerrold: BUT IT SAYS HERE “I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THESE TERMS”!
- Defendant: Yes, but I didn't read that either.