You have read and understood these terms: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:''Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C''.: M’lud, we have conclusive evidence that the defendant knew of this disclaimer, rendered I might add in [[CAPS LOCK|FULL CAPITALS]] on page 346 of the presentation. | :''Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C''.: M’lud, we have conclusive evidence that the defendant knew of this disclaimer, rendered I might add in [[CAPS LOCK|FULL CAPITALS]] on page 346 of the presentation. | ||
:''Defendant'': | :''Defendant'': Oh, no I didn't. | ||
:''Lord Justice Cockle-Carrot M.R.'': | :''Lord Justice Cockle-Carrot M.R.'': Didn’t you? | ||
:''Defendant''. No, sir. I didn't read it! | :''Defendant''. No, sir. I didn't read it! | ||
:''Sir Jerrold'': BUT IT SAYS HERE | :''Cockle-Carrott MR'': I say! Really, Sir Jerr — | ||
:''Defendant'': | :''Sir Jerrold'': BUT, MRS. PINTERMAN, IT SAYS HERE “[[You have read and understood these terms|YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THESE TERMS]]”! | ||
:''Defendant'': Well it might do, but how should I know? I didn't read that either. | |||
Revision as of 18:19, 15 October 2019
|
Towards more picturesque speech™
|
It’s great isn’t it? Can you just imagine the turtle you’d be looking under to prove this one?
- Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C.: M’lud, we have conclusive evidence that the defendant knew of this disclaimer, rendered I might add in FULL CAPITALS on page 346 of the presentation.
- Defendant: Oh, no I didn't.
- Lord Justice Cockle-Carrot M.R.: Didn’t you?
- Defendant. No, sir. I didn't read it!
- Cockle-Carrott MR: I say! Really, Sir Jerr —
- Sir Jerrold: BUT, MRS. PINTERMAN, IT SAYS HERE “YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THESE TERMS”!
- Defendant: Well it might do, but how should I know? I didn't read that either.