Simple contract: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{g}}{{simple contract}} {{sa}} *Limitation Act 1980 *Statue of limitations"
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}{{simple contract}}
{{g}}{{simplecontract}}
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Limitation Act 1980]]
*[[Limitation Act 1980]]
*[[Statue of limitations]]
*[[Statue of limitations]]

Revision as of 12:41, 7 November 2019

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Under the Limitation Act 1980 a “Simple contract” is one that is neither a “specialty[1] nor an insurance contract[2] nor a “contract of loan” which has no fixed repayment date, where repayment is not conditional on a demand, [warning:strap yourselves in for this next bit]

“except where, in connection with taking the loan, the debtor enters into any collateral obligation to pay the amount of the debt or any part of it (as, for example, by delivering a promissory note as security for the debt) on terms which would exclude the application of this section to the contract of loan if they applied directly to repayment of the debt.”

We quote that last bit in full because, for a short extract, it is bloody hard to decipher. There are no explanatory notes to the Limitation Act 1980, but for help we have that Law Commission bunker buster which says:

“Section 6 does not apply where the debtor enters into a collateral obligation to pay the amount of the debt or any part of it on a fixed or determinable date or conditional on a demand for repayment (or other condition).”

So if the promissory note itself is a demand loan, but it is pledged as collateral for another debt which isn’t, then it counts as having a payment date. That’s the best I can do.

Note: “repayment on a stated maturity date, conditional upon demand by the creditor”, sounds a lot like the process for redeeming a bond — at least when held in physical, definitive form. Thus, definitive debt securities are not simple contracts.

Whether this is true of electronically cleared debt securities — that is, ahhh — all of them, these days — is a an interesting question, as these are paid out automatically to account holders in clearing systems.

See also

  1. A written document like a security deed that has been sealed, delivered and given as security for the payment of a specific debt.
  2. Perhaps not “simple” because of the implied duty of utmost good faith — who knows?