Manifest error: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:“it is quite possible for one person to certify the existence of some fact at a particular moment in time which the other person, the recipient of the certificate, cannot verify [[save]] after the occurrence of a subsequent event”. | :“it is quite possible for one person to certify the existence of some fact at a particular moment in time which the other person, the recipient of the certificate, cannot verify [[save]] after the occurrence of a subsequent event”. | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*{{t|indemnity}} | *{{t|indemnity}} | ||
*[[Conclusive evidence]] | *[[Conclusive evidence]] | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
Revision as of 11:36, 18 January 2020
|
“manifest error” was in IIG Capital llc v Van der Merwe[1] as one which is “obvious or easily demonstrable without extensive investigation” even if not readily apparent at the time that the certificate was provided.
In North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holdings Inc the court said:
- “it is quite possible for one person to certify the existence of some fact at a particular moment in time which the other person, the recipient of the certificate, cannot verify save after the occurrence of a subsequent event”.
See also
References
- ↑ [2007] EWHC 435 para 52