Panel discussion: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 2: Line 2:


Sorry where was I?
Sorry where was I?
In any case case in as we move


Just what possesses people to post images to [[LinkedIn]] of themselves sitting awkwardly on a low stage in front of thirty bored associate directors, with “great [[panel discussion]] today about the [[EMIR refit]]!”
Just what possesses people to post images to [[LinkedIn]] of themselves sitting awkwardly on a low stage in front of thirty bored associate directors, with “great [[panel discussion]] today about the [[EMIR refit]]!”

Revision as of 20:29, 14 November 2019

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Along with computer-based training and continuing professional development, the panel discussion — jammed between workshops at an all-day conference as cheap filler, like one of those dreary Inside Africa fillers that run on a loop on CNN international, watched only by business travelers captive of the Airport Hilton in Bucharest, is one of the great blights of a modern corporate life quite overwhelmed with them. This is not to say the keynote sessions that run aside of them are a whole lot better, but the idea of hearing an assemblage of aspiring junior partners, industry association inhouse counsel and random change management consultants mumble disinterestedly about the impact on market stability of transa —

Sorry where was I?

In any case case in as we move

Just what possesses people to post images to LinkedIn of themselves sitting awkwardly on a low stage in front of thirty bored associate directors, with “great panel discussion today about the EMIR refit!”

What do they have in mind? Do they imagine their network to be flooded with envy, or jealousy, or remorse at the sparkling debate it now discovers it has missed?

See also