1995 Overseas Securities Lender’s Agreement: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Redirected page to OSLA Anatomy Tag: New redirect |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Removed redirect to OSLA Anatomy Tag: Removed redirect |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fwmdtt|nickname=OSLA| imagetype=jpg| tagline= Short? That's not a short. ''This'' is a short!| documentation= {{osla}}. Vague, arcane, outdated and no [[netting aiorbags.| docscore=4| amendability= Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but more likely to tip out and sign up a fresh {{gmsla}}.|amendscore=2| collateral= Yes. Could be stocks, bonds — anything.| collateralscore =1| transferability= bilateral. Homey don’t ride that bus.| transferscore =0| leverage=Fully cash collateralised, but a bonus point for the contra-flow collateral haircut. The ''lender'' net borrows from the ''borrower''. ''Nice''.| leveragescore =1| frightometer= Generally sleepy “pluming of the financial, system” material, but shortsville, generally anacchronistic and no netting, so [[GameStop]] freakout territory.| frightscore=5}} | |||
Revision as of 20:14, 9 February 2023
{{fwmdtt|nickname=OSLA| imagetype=jpg| tagline= Short? That's not a short. This is a short!| documentation= 1995 OSLA. Vague, arcane, outdated and no [[netting aiorbags.| docscore=4| amendability= Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but more likely to tip out and sign up a fresh 2010 GMSLA.|amendscore=2| collateral= Yes. Could be stocks, bonds — anything.| collateralscore =1| transferability= bilateral. Homey don’t ride that bus.| transferscore =0| leverage=Fully cash collateralised, but a bonus point for the contra-flow collateral haircut. The lender net borrows from the borrower. Nice.| leveragescore =1| frightometer= Generally sleepy “pluming of the financial, system” material, but shortsville, generally anacchronistic and no netting, so GameStop freakout territory.| frightscore=5}}