No-fault termination: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}Conclusion of one’s {{tag|contract}}ual arrangements without any hot-headedness, jabbing fingers or hurt feelings. Terminating a {{t|contract}} by delivering notice, and announcing, ''apropos'' nothing in particular, that it’s time to move on.
{{g}}Conclusion of one’s {{tag|contract}}ual arrangements without any hot-headedness, jabbing fingers or hurt feelings. Terminating a [[contract]] by delivering notice, and announcing, ''apropos'' nothing in particular, that it’s time to move on.


To be contrasted with [[event of default|termination with extreme prejudice]].
To be contrasted with [[event of default|termination with extreme prejudice]].

Revision as of 13:29, 14 August 2024

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Conclusion of one’s contractual arrangements without any hot-headedness, jabbing fingers or hurt feelings. Terminating a contract by delivering notice, and announcing, apropos nothing in particular, that it’s time to move on.

To be contrasted with termination with extreme prejudice.

Fun fact: There is no means to terminate an ISDA Master Agreement on notice. Either you go Full Metal Jacket — and even then you can’t finally kill it — or Hotel California. That’s right: without some special pleading — involving garlic, wooden stakes and the agreement of the parties, an ISDA cannot die.

See also