Expenses - VM CSA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{csaanat|8|2016}}
{{csaanat|8|2016}}
Paragraph {{csaprov|8}} of the {{vmcsa}} is identical to the [[8 - CSA Provision|equivalent]] in the {{csa}}. Being a function of the common law of contract, it falls into the goes without saying category. But  
Paragraph {{csaprov|8}} of the {{vmcsa}} is identical to the [[8 - CSA Provision|equivalent]] in the {{csa}}. Being a function of the [[common law]] of [[contract]], not to mention common sense — why would someone else be liable for your costs and expenses of performing a contract unless it specifically said they would be? — it falls into the goes without saying category. But {{icds}} said it anyway.
{{icds}} said it anyway.

Revision as of 00:41, 4 January 2020

2016 VM CSA Anatomy™


In a Nutshell Section 8:

Paragraph 8. Expenses
Each party will be liable for its own costs (including stamp duties) of performing its obligations under this Annex).
view template

2016 VM CSA full text of Section 8:

Paragraph 8. Expenses
Each party will pay its own costs and expenses (including any stamp, transfer or similar transaction tax or duty payable on any transfer it is required to make under this Annex) in connection with performing its obligations under this Annex, and neither party will be liable for any such costs and expenses incurred by the other party.
view template

Related Agreements
Click here for the text of Section 8 in the 1995 English Law CSA
Click here for the text of Section 8 in the 2016 English Law VM CSA
Click [[{{{3}}} - NY VM CSA Provision|here]] for the text of the equivalent, Section [[{{{3}}} - NY VM CSA Provision|{{{3}}}]] in the 2016 NY Law VM CSA
Comparisons
1995 CSA and 2016 VM CSA: click for comparison
{{nycsadiff {{{3}}}}}

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


Paragraph 8 of the 2016 VM CSA is identical to the equivalent in the 1995 CSA. Being a function of the common law of contract, not to mention common sense — why would someone else be liable for your costs and expenses of performing a contract unless it specifically said they would be? — it falls into the goes without saying category. But ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ said it anyway.