Specified Condition - NY VM CSA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
These {{nyvmcsaprov|Specified Condition}}s, you might imagine, have a slightly softer pallor as they confer less onerous rights — simply disabling a {{nyvmcsaprov|Secured Party}}’s right to [[rehypothecate]] the {{nyvmcsaprov|Posted Collateral (VM)}} a {{nyvmcsaprov|Pledgor}} may have given to it. | These {{nyvmcsaprov|Specified Condition}}s, you might imagine, have a slightly softer pallor as they confer less onerous rights — simply disabling a {{nyvmcsaprov|Secured Party}}’s right to [[rehypothecate]] the {{nyvmcsaprov|Posted Collateral (VM)}} a {{nyvmcsaprov|Pledgor}} may have given to it. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Use of Posted Collateral (VM) - NY VM CSA Provision]] |
Revision as of 18:27, 8 January 2020
Unique to the 2016 NY Law VM CSA these Special Conditions are an extra little means of adding still more triggers into your ISDA Master Agreement — as if the Events of Default and Early Termination Events you have laboriously written in aren’t enough.
These Specified Conditions, you might imagine, have a slightly softer pallor as they confer less onerous rights — simply disabling a Secured Party’s right to rehypothecate the Posted Collateral (VM) a Pledgor may have given to it.