Specified Condition - NY VM CSA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{csaanat|Specified Condition|2016ny}} | {{csaanat|Specified Condition|2016ny}} | ||
Unique to the {{nyvmcsa}} these {{nyvmcsaprov| | Unique to the {{nyvmcsa}} these {{nyvmcsaprov|Specified Condition}}s are an extra little means of adding still ''more'' triggers into your {{isdama}} — as if the {{isdaprov|Events of Default}} and {{isdaprov|Early Termination Event}}s you have laboriously written in aren’t enough. | ||
These {{nyvmcsaprov|Specified Condition}}s, you might imagine, have a slightly softer pallor as they confer less onerous rights — simply disabling a {{nyvmcsaprov|Secured Party}}’s right to [[rehypothecate]] the {{nyvmcsaprov|Posted Collateral (VM)}} a {{nyvmcsaprov|Pledgor}} may have given to it. | These {{nyvmcsaprov|Specified Condition}}s, you might imagine, have a slightly softer pallor as they confer less onerous rights — simply disabling a {{nyvmcsaprov|Secured Party}}’s right to [[rehypothecate]] the {{nyvmcsaprov|Posted Collateral (VM)}} a {{nyvmcsaprov|Pledgor}} may have given to it. |
Revision as of 18:27, 8 January 2020
Unique to the 2016 NY Law VM CSA these Specified Conditions are an extra little means of adding still more triggers into your ISDA Master Agreement — as if the Events of Default and Early Termination Events you have laboriously written in aren’t enough.
These Specified Conditions, you might imagine, have a slightly softer pallor as they confer less onerous rights — simply disabling a Secured Party’s right to rehypothecate the Posted Collateral (VM) a Pledgor may have given to it.