Template:Rep no violation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "No, it doesn't make any sense to add this agreement, nor to have a separate continuing warranty that you have not breached this agreement. That is t..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
No, it | No, it doesn’t make any sense to add this agreement, nor to have a separate continuing [[warranty]] that you have not [[Breach of contract|breached this agreement]]. That is tantamount to a {{repprov|no event of default}} rep — so you should already have it — and as canvassed in that very article, that [[representation]] is, in any case, a big old waste of time. If I ''tell'' you I have not breached the agreement, but in actual fact, I ''have'', in what way are you in a better position than if I ''didn't'' tell you that? <br> | ||
Revision as of 17:26, 30 June 2020
No, it doesn’t make any sense to add this agreement, nor to have a separate continuing warranty that you have not breached this agreement. That is tantamount to a no event of default rep — so you should already have it — and as canvassed in that very article, that representation is, in any case, a big old waste of time. If I tell you I have not breached the agreement, but in actual fact, I have, in what way are you in a better position than if I didn't tell you that?