Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 9(h): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "''There is no strict equivalent in the {{1992ma}}. But see Section {{isda92prov|2(e)}}, which is a fair-arsed attempt at the same thing. <br> Friends of the JC will know that..." Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''There is no strict equivalent in the {{1992ma}}. But see Section {{isda92prov|2(e)}}, which is a | ''There is no strict equivalent in the {{1992ma}}. But see Section {{isda92prov|2(e)}}, which is a half-arsed attempt at the same thing. <br> | ||
Friends of the JC will know that half-arsed isn't always bad, of course, as you may come to see as you step through this monstrosity, truly from the “{{isia}}” file. | Friends of the JC will know that half-arsed isn't always bad, of course, as you may come to see as you step through this monstrosity, truly from the “{{isia}}” file. | ||
Revision as of 16:50, 19 February 2020
There is no strict equivalent in the 1992 ISDA. But see Section 2(e), which is a half-arsed attempt at the same thing.
Friends of the JC will know that half-arsed isn't always bad, of course, as you may come to see as you step through this monstrosity, truly from the “I’m sorry I asked” file.
Well, you did ask.
9 Miscellaneous
9(a) Entire Agreement
9(b) Amendments
9(c) Survival of Obligations
9(d) Remedies Cumulative
9(e) Counterparts and Confirmations
9(f) No Waiver of Rights
9(g) Headings
9(h) Interest and Compensation (2002 ISDA only)