Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 3(c): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Section {{isda92prov|3(c)}} was one of the bits of the {{1992ma}} that {{icds}} “got right” at the first time of asking. No changes in the {{2002ma}}, therefore."
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Section {{isda92prov|3(c)}} was one of the bits of the {{1992ma}} that {{icds}} “got right” at the first time of asking. No changes in the {{2002ma}}, therefore.
{{isda 3(c) comp|isdaprov}}

Latest revision as of 17:10, 2 February 2022

Section 3(c) was one of the bits of the 1992 ISDA that ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ “got mostly right” at the first time of asking. But still, some bright sparks on the ’Squad took it upon themselves, in the 2002 ISDA, to switch out reference to “Affiliates” which — I don’t know, might take in some distant half-bred cousin you don’t enormously care about and who doesn’t cast any real shadow on your creditworthiness — with “Credit Support Providers” and “Specified Entities” who no doubt more keenly do, but this leads to just more fiddliness in the Schedule over-stuffed with fiddliness, since one must then go to the trouble of specifying, and then arguing with your counterparties about, who should count as a Specified Entity for this remote and rather vacuous purpose.

Keeps the home fires burning in the hobbity shires where ISDA negotiators make their homes, we suppose.