Template:M summ 2002 ISDA 2(a): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Section {{isdaprov|2}} contains the basic nuts and bolts of your obligations under the {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s you execute. Pay or deliver what you’ve promised to pay or deliver, when you’ve promised to pay it or deliver it, and all will be well. | Section {{isdaprov|2}} contains the basic nuts and bolts of your obligations under the {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s you execute. Pay or deliver what you’ve promised to pay or deliver, when you’ve promised to pay it or deliver it, and all will be well. | ||
And ''then'' there’s the mighty [[flawed asset]] provision of Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}}. This won’t trouble ISDA [[ | And ''then'' there’s the mighty [[flawed asset]] provision of Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}}. This won’t trouble ISDA [[negotiator]]s on the way ''in'' to a swap trading relationship — few people argue understand it enough to argue about it — but if, as it surely well, [[Omega|the great day of judgement]] should visit upon the financial markets again some time in the future, expect plenty of tasty argument, between highly-paid Queen’s Counsel who have spent exactly ''none'' of their careers considering derivative contracts, about what exactly it means. |
Revision as of 15:00, 23 February 2020
Section 2 contains the basic nuts and bolts of your obligations under the Transactions you execute. Pay or deliver what you’ve promised to pay or deliver, when you’ve promised to pay it or deliver it, and all will be well.
And then there’s the mighty flawed asset provision of Section 2(a)(iii). This won’t trouble ISDA negotiators on the way in to a swap trading relationship — few people argue understand it enough to argue about it — but if, as it surely well, the great day of judgement should visit upon the financial markets again some time in the future, expect plenty of tasty argument, between highly-paid Queen’s Counsel who have spent exactly none of their careers considering derivative contracts, about what exactly it means.