Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 5(a)(ii): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:06, 25 February 2020

Note the addition of Repudiation of Agreement to the 2002 ISDA. Common law purists like the JC will grumble that you don’t really need to set out repudiation as a breach justifying termination of a contract, because that’s what it is by definition but stating the bleeding obvious has never stopped ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ before.

Revision as of 09:05, 25 February 2020 view source Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 88,421 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:06, 25 February 2020 view source Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 88,421 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Note the addition of {{isdaprov\|Repudiation of Agreement}} to the {{2002ma}}. ~~You do’t~~ really ''need'' to set out [[repudiation]] as a breach justifying termination of a [[contract]], because ''[[Repudiation\|that’s what it is by definition]]'' but ~~that~~ has never stopped {{icds}} before.		Note the addition of {{isdaprov\|Repudiation of Agreement}} to the {{2002ma}}. [[Common law]] purists like the [[JC]] will grumble that you don’t really ''need'' to set out [[repudiation]] as a breach justifying termination of a [[contract]], because ''[[Repudiation\|that’s what it is by definition]]'' but stating the bleeding obvious has never stopped {{icds}} before.