Template:M summ Equity Derivatives 10.1(b): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A key part of the Kafkaesque labyrinth you must navigate to work out how much, and when, your {{eqderivprov|Dividend Amount}} (or, if you’re looking at paragraph {{eqderivprov|10.7(b)}}, {{eqderivprov|Extraordinary Dividend}}) will be paid. | A key part of the Kafkaesque labyrinth you must navigate to work out how much, and when, your {{eqderivprov|Dividend Amount}} (or, if you’re looking at paragraph {{eqderivprov|10.7(b)}}, {{eqderivprov|Extraordinary Dividend}}) will be paid. | ||
Spoiler: referencing the {{eqderivprov|Ex Amount}} or the {{eqderivprov|Record Amount}} doesn’t make much sense. Referencing the {{eqderivprov|Paid Amount}} ''would'', had {{icds}} drafted it properly. The [[JC]] has a proposed [[Paid Amount (Dividend Amount) - Equity Derivatives Provision|fix]]. | Spoiler: referencing the {{eqderivprov|Ex Amount}} or the {{eqderivprov|Record Amount}} for a manufactured distribution under an [[equity derivative]] doesn’t make much sense. Referencing the {{eqderivprov|Paid Amount}} ''would'', had {{icds}} drafted it properly. The [[JC]] has a proposed [[Paid Amount (Dividend Amount) - Equity Derivatives Provision|fix]]. | ||
Revision as of 18:16, 25 February 2020
A key part of the Kafkaesque labyrinth you must navigate to work out how much, and when, your Dividend Amount (or, if you’re looking at paragraph 10.7(b), Extraordinary Dividend) will be paid.
Spoiler: referencing the Ex Amount or the Record Amount for a manufactured distribution under an equity derivative doesn’t make much sense. Referencing the Paid Amount would, had ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ drafted it properly. The JC has a proposed fix.