Perfection is the enemy of good enough: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|maxim|}}“Perfection is the enemy of good enough.”
{{a|maxim|}}“Perfection is the enemy of good enough.” Easy enough for Voltaire to say, apparently impossible for anyone to understand when contemplating the potential for [[reg tech]] to assist the legal process. In a nutshell, if you think, with Daniel Susskind, that [[AI]] will any time soon be replacing lawyers wholesale and putting the profession out of a job, you are going to be disappointed for a ''very'' long time. Don’t forget the [[JC]]’s {{t|maxim}}: [[reg tech can remain disappointing longer than you can remain animate]].<ref>With apologies to John Maynard Keynes and his aphorism: “the markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”</ref>


Enough to satisfy most people other than [[lawyers]] and the kind of child<ref>And what do children like that grow up to be? YOU ARE LOOKING AT ONE.</ref> who, when writing postcards to his grandparents, addresses it thus:
If, however, you look at [[AI]] as a tool to ''quickly'' knock out the easy stuff — fix the formatting, spot that the governing law is not English, word-search for '''<indemn*>''' <br> — but that you, kind sir, still have a role reading the agreement to pick out the ''hard stuff'' — then you may expect years of trouble-free motoring.
 
“Good enough” is enough to satisfy most people other than [[lawyers]] and the kind of child<ref>And what do children like that grow up to be? YOU ARE LOOKING AT ONE.</ref> who, when writing postcards to his grandparents, addresses it thus:


{{grandma's address}}
{{grandma's address}}

Revision as of 14:38, 25 September 2020

A hearty collection of the JC’s pithiest adages.
Index: Click ᐅ to expand:
Maxim
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

“Perfection is the enemy of good enough.” Easy enough for Voltaire to say, apparently impossible for anyone to understand when contemplating the potential for reg tech to assist the legal process. In a nutshell, if you think, with Daniel Susskind, that AI will any time soon be replacing lawyers wholesale and putting the profession out of a job, you are going to be disappointed for a very long time. Don’t forget the JC’s maxim: reg tech can remain disappointing longer than you can remain animate.[1]

If, however, you look at AI as a tool to quickly knock out the easy stuff — fix the formatting, spot that the governing law is not English, word-search for <indemn*>
— but that you, kind sir, still have a role reading the agreement to pick out the hard stuff — then you may expect years of trouble-free motoring.

“Good enough” is enough to satisfy most people other than lawyers and the kind of child[2] who, when writing postcards to his grandparents, addresses it thus:

Grandma Contrarian,
24 Argumentative Road
Whingeing
Essex EX4 5FU
England
United Kingdom
The World,
The Solar System,
The Western Arm, Milky Way
The Local Group,
The Virgo Supercluster,
The Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex,
The Observable Universe,
The Whole Universe including the unseen bits including all forms of Dark Matter and/or Dark Energy,
The Multiverse[3]

If you like this you should try everything else Voltaire wrote while you’re at it. He’s a scream. Start with Candide.

See also

References

  1. ↑ With apologies to John Maynard Keynes and his aphorism: “the markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
  2. ↑ And what do children like that grow up to be? YOU ARE LOOKING AT ONE.
  3. ↑ Ok I am making this up clearly the (preposterous) cosmological hypothetical on which this relies was not widely known in the 1970s and certainly wouldn't have been known to a seven year old,
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Perfection_is_the_enemy_of_good_enough&oldid=47331"