Template:M summ 1992 ISDA Force Majeure Event: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
===Section {{isdaprov|5(b)(ii)}} in the {{1992ma}}===
===[[Force majeure]] in the {{1992ma}}===
There is no equivalent to the {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} in the {{1992ma}}. An {{isda92prov|Impossibility}} clause was frequently written into the Schedule, which endeavoured to do the same thing. One can incorporate {{isdaprov|Force Majeure}} into the {{1992ma}} as long as you carry the concept through to its logical conclusion i.e.:
There is no equivalent to the {{2002ma}}’s {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} in the {{1992ma}}. You could, and many old-timers do, write an {{isda92prov|Impossibility}} clause was into the {{isda92prov|Schedule}}, which endeavoured to do the same thing. One can incorporate {{isda92prov|Force Majeure}} into the {{1992ma}} as long as you carry the concept through to its logical conclusion i.e.:
*Include a {{isdaprov|Hierachy of Events}};  
*Include a {{isda92prov|Hierachy of Events}};  
*Consider the impact re a deferral of {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}} etc.  
*Consider the impact re a deferral of {{isda92prov|Early Termination Amount}} etc.  
The concept also impacts the basis of [[Close Out]] because the {{2002ma}} requires use of true mids for valuation i.e, not the mean of each party's view of the bid/offer where a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} (or {{isdaprov|Illegality}}) occurs, which is effectively what you get under the {{1992ma}} with a “Two {{isdaprov|Affected Parties}}” option.
The concept also impacts the basis of [[Close Out]] because the {{2002ma}} requires true mids for valuation i.e, not the mean of each party's view of the [[Bid-offer spread|bid/offer]] where a {{isda92prov|Force Majeure Event}} (or {{isda92prov|Illegality}}) occurs, which is effectively what you get under the {{1992ma}} with a “Two {{isda92prov|Affected Parties}}” option.

Revision as of 16:51, 18 March 2020

Force majeure in the 1992 ISDA

There is no equivalent to the 2002 ISDA’s Force Majeure Event in the 1992 ISDA. You could, and many old-timers do, write an Impossibility clause was into the Schedule, which endeavoured to do the same thing. One can incorporate Force Majeure into the 1992 ISDA as long as you carry the concept through to its logical conclusion i.e.:

The concept also impacts the basis of Close Out because the 2002 ISDA requires true mids for valuation i.e, not the mean of each party's view of the bid/offer where a Force Majeure Event (or Illegality) occurs, which is effectively what you get under the 1992 ISDA with a “Two Affected Parties” option.

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:M_summ_1992_ISDA_Force_Majeure_Event&oldid=41804"