Template:Ex amount and coronavirus: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "So what happens if you have selected {{eqderivprov|Ex Amount}} as your {{eqderivprov|Dividend Amount}} payment method, and the {{eqderivprov|Issuer}} declares a {{eqderivprov|..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So what happens if you have selected {{eqderivprov|Ex Amount}} as your {{eqderivprov|Dividend Amount}} payment method, and the {{eqderivprov|Issuer}} declares a {{eqderivprov|Dividend}}, the {{eqderivprov|Record Date}} passes as expected, the {{eqderivprov|Share}} starts trading [[ex-dividend]] as, by rights, it should do. ''and then something unexpected and properly epochal happens — like [[Coronavirus|the world basically ceasing to rotate on its axis for a prolonged and indeterminate time]], prompting said issuer to ''cancel'' its dividend | So what happens if you have selected {{eqderivprov|Ex Amount}} as your {{eqderivprov|Dividend Amount}} payment method, and the {{eqderivprov|Issuer}} declares a {{eqderivprov|Dividend}}, the {{eqderivprov|Record Date}} passes as expected, the {{eqderivprov|Share}} starts trading [[ex-dividend]] as, by rights, it should do. ''and then something unexpected and properly epochal happens — like [[Coronavirus|the world basically ceasing to rotate on its axis for a prolonged and indeterminate time]]'', prompting said issuer to ''cancel'' its dividend. What then? | ||
Clearly the intention of a [[derivative]] is to replicate as closely as possible the performance of the underlier. It cannot be expected that an equity derivative counterparty intends to [[guarantee]] an {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}’s obligation that the {{eqderivprov|Issuer}} itself does not ultimately perform —especially if it is not legally obliged to perform that obligation in any case (however unconventional not doing so might be) — so it would be odd to find a {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} requiring an {{eqderivprov|Equity Amount Payer}} to pay a {{eqderivprov|Dividend Amount}} notwithstanding cancellation of the actual dividend on the underlying {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}. You would expect anyone writing that kind of [[put option]] to demand quite some premium for it. | Clearly the intention of a [[derivative]] is to replicate as closely as possible the performance of the underlier. It cannot be expected that an equity derivative counterparty intends to [[guarantee]] an {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}’s obligation that the {{eqderivprov|Issuer}} itself does not ultimately perform —especially if it is not legally obliged to perform that obligation in any case (however unconventional not doing so might be) — so it would be odd to find a {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} requiring an {{eqderivprov|Equity Amount Payer}} to pay a {{eqderivprov|Dividend Amount}} notwithstanding cancellation of the actual dividend on the underlying {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}. You would expect anyone writing that kind of [[put option]] to demand quite some premium for it. |
Revision as of 22:10, 27 March 2020
So what happens if you have selected Ex Amount as your Dividend Amount payment method, and the Issuer declares a Dividend, the Record Date passes as expected, the Share starts trading ex-dividend as, by rights, it should do. and then something unexpected and properly epochal happens — like the world basically ceasing to rotate on its axis for a prolonged and indeterminate time, prompting said issuer to cancel its dividend. What then?
Clearly the intention of a derivative is to replicate as closely as possible the performance of the underlier. It cannot be expected that an equity derivative counterparty intends to guarantee an Issuer’s obligation that the Issuer itself does not ultimately perform —especially if it is not legally obliged to perform that obligation in any case (however unconventional not doing so might be) — so it would be odd to find a Transaction requiring an Equity Amount Payer to pay a Dividend Amount notwithstanding cancellation of the actual dividend on the underlying Issuer. You would expect anyone writing that kind of put option to demand quite some premium for it.
Yet that is what a cold reading of the Ex Amount method (if not modified by some kind of clawback) seems to do: :“100% of the gross cash dividend per share declared by the Issuer to holders of record of a Share where the date that the Shares have commenced trading “ex-dividend” on the Exchange occurs during the relevant Dividend Period”.
The above “cold reading” does not accord with the economic facts as market participants understand them. We suspect that common sense will prevail and no one will be cavalier enough to take this point. But you just never know.