Credit Support Provider - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should a Party to the document, where there is a CSA, be described as a "Credit Support Provider"? | Should a Party to the document, where there is a CSA, be described as a "Credit Support Provider"? | ||
'''No''', sayeth the | '''No''', sayeth the Users' Guide to the {{1994csa}}: | ||
{{quote|"Parties to an {{isdama}} should not, however, be identified as Credit Support Providers with respect to | {{quote|"Parties to an {{isdama}} should not, however, be identified as Credit Support Providers with respect to | ||
Revision as of 12:45, 8 November 2012
Should a Party to the document, where there is a CSA, be described as a "Credit Support Provider"?
No, sayeth the Users' Guide to the 1994 NY CSA:
"Parties to an ISDA Master Agreement should not, however, be identified as Credit Support Providers with respect to
the Annex, as such term is intended only to apply to third parties"