Two Affected Parties - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{manual|MI|2002|6(b)(iii)|Section|6(b)(iii)| | {{manual|MI|2002|6(b)(iii)|Section|6(b)(iii)|medium}} |
Revision as of 18:29, 13 September 2022
Content and comparisons
Summary
Handwaving appeals to one another’s good natures with this talk of reasonableness and, of course, both parties will probably be incentivised to keep the trade on foot if some unfortunate tax eventuality comes about — seeing as they were incentivised enough to start it —but ultimately, this is an agreement to agree, however you dress it up, and is as contractually enforceable as one. That is, not very.
General discussion
Section 6(b)(iii) Two Affected Parties
Well, if they are both Affected Parties they can do their best to agree a fix, but this is what all eagle-eyed members of legal squad will recognise as an agreement to agree.