Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA Close-out Amount: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{isdacomparison}}<br> | {{isdacomparison}}<br> | ||
{{eta vs close-out amount}} | |||
{{icds}} introduced the {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}} into the {{2002ma}} to correct the total trainwreck of a close-out methodology set out in the {{1992ma}}. In the “good old days”, you valued {{isdaprov|Terminated Transaction}}s were valued according to {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} or {{isdaprov|Loss}} and those un-intuitive and — well, flat-out ''nutso'' — “[[First Method - ISDA Provision|First]]” and “[[Second Method - ISDA Provision|Second]]” Methods. There is a “{{isda92prov|Settlement Amount}}” concept under the {{1992ma}}, but it only really relates to {{isda92prov|Market Quotation}}. | {{icds}} introduced the {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}} into the {{2002ma}} to correct the total trainwreck of a close-out methodology set out in the {{1992ma}}. In the “good old days”, you valued {{isdaprov|Terminated Transaction}}s were valued according to {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} or {{isdaprov|Loss}} and those un-intuitive and — well, flat-out ''nutso'' — “[[First Method - ISDA Provision|First]]” and “[[Second Method - ISDA Provision|Second]]” Methods. There is a “{{isda92prov|Settlement Amount}}” concept under the {{1992ma}}, but it only really relates to {{isda92prov|Market Quotation}}. |
Revision as of 14:03, 17 June 2020
See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.
On the difference between an “Early Termination Amount” and a “Close-out Amount”
Regrettably, the 1992 ISDA features neither an {{{{{1}}}|Early Termination Amount}} nor a {{{{{1}}}|Close-out Amount}}. The 2002 ISDA has both, which looks like rather an indulgence until you realise that they do different things.
A {{{{{1}}}|Close-out Amount}} is the termination value for a single {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}}, or a related group of {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}}s that a {{{{{1}}}|Non-Defaulting Party}} or {{{{{1}}}|Non-Affected Party}} calculates while closing out an 2002 ISDA, but it is not the final, overall sum due under the ISDA Master Agreement itself. Each of the determined {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}} {{{{{1}}}|Close-out Amount}}s summed with the various {{{{{1}}}|Unpaid Amount}}s to arrive at the {{{{{1}}}|Early Termination Amount}}, which is the total net sum due under the ISDA Master Agreement after the close-out process. (See Section {{{{{1}}}|6(e)(i)}} for more on that).
ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ introduced the Close-out Amount into the 2002 ISDA to correct the total trainwreck of a close-out methodology set out in the 1992 ISDA. In the “good old days”, you valued Terminated Transactions were valued according to Market Quotation or Loss and those un-intuitive and — well, flat-out nutso — “First” and “Second” Methods. There is a “Settlement Amount” concept under the 1992 ISDA, but it only really relates to Market Quotation.