Hypothetical: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}}Plausible deniability. | {{g}}Plausible deniability. | ||
A [[lawyer]]’s “scare quotes” that | A [[lawyer]]’s “scare quotes” that say, “we didn’t have this conversation, and if you claim that we did, I will deny all knowledge. But as we both know, we ''did''. But, as far as the boss is concerned, I we didn’t.” | ||
“Didn’t what?” | |||
A tap on the nose, a knowing look | A tap on the nose, a knowing look and a wise expression which says, “''precisely'', my dear fellow. ''Precisely''” . | ||
[[Hypothetical]]s hail from the same bank of the River Pedantry as “[[equivalence]]” — or should we say, | [[Hypothetical]]s hail from the same bank of the River Pedantry as “[[equivalence]]” — or should we say, they hail from a bank equal to the same bank as equivalence (it seems only fair) — and often are promptly followed by a vigorous bout of [[deem]]ing. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
Revision as of 17:01, 20 July 2020
|
Plausible deniability.
A lawyer’s “scare quotes” that say, “we didn’t have this conversation, and if you claim that we did, I will deny all knowledge. But as we both know, we did. But, as far as the boss is concerned, I we didn’t.”
“Didn’t what?”
A tap on the nose, a knowing look and a wise expression which says, “precisely, my dear fellow. Precisely” .
Hypotheticals hail from the same bank of the River Pedantry as “equivalence” — or should we say, they hail from a bank equal to the same bank as equivalence (it seems only fair) — and often are promptly followed by a vigorous bout of deeming.
See also
- Deem
- The reasonable man (or, for that matter, woman)
- Sexy language. Sorry, I mean sexist language.